Talk:Lynch/Oz

A fact from Lynch/Oz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the documentary Lynch/Oz incorporates hundreds of film clips to illustrate the influence of The Wizard of Oz on the work of filmmaker David Lynch?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lynch/Oz.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

David Lynch

... that the documentary Lynch/Oz incorporates hundreds of film clips to illustrate the influence of The Wizard of Oz on the work of filmmaker David Lynch (pictured)? Source: "With its impressive array of hundreds of film clips..." "Philippe illustrates their insights with endless rolling montages of movie clips, and of course by pinpointing the key visual examples of Lynch/”Oz” connection."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Erika Thompson

Moved to mainspace by Οἶδα (talk). Self-nominated at 11:54, 26 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lynch/Oz; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

I'll review this one! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing: - Added three citation needed tags under "Synopsis"
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: - Need a QPQ
Overall: I'll note that Earwig gave a relatively high score on some articles, but it's all quotations and names, so it's all good here. Need a QPQ and citation needed tags to be filled and we'll be all good. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ping for Οἶδα MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- MyCatIsAChonk Thank you for reviewing! I have personally created only two DYK nominations in the past. This will be my third. However, I have gone ahead and reviewed one other nomination. I have also fixed the inline citation issue caused by a paragraph break which left the latter portion of the first paragraph unreferenced. Οἶδα (talk) 06:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Seemingly abandoned by the previous reviewer, so I'm reviewing it. BorgQueen (talk) 23:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]