Talk:Luzzu

Malta Low‑importance

	Malta portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Repositioning of images

Can you help by seeking the best position of the image Maltesedog 14:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just to notify that the luzzu appeared on the older minting of the Maltese lira as after 1989 a new coat of arms was chosen for Malta.

new template - why

Is it really necessary to have a plenty of templates in every article? I guess it is better to link to an article, where all those boats are described. If you overload every article with templates on this and that so somewehere it will get unreadable. Blowup (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's difficult to find a balance. But the Luzzu is an important example of a traditional fishing boat - even though the details of that have not yet been fleshed out in the article. The navigation panel makes it easy to cruise round other traditional boats, and past experience shows the hit rate for articles like this trebles when the navigation panel is added. Otherwise the article remains relatively orphaned. --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]