This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
So, one editor wants to insert this, and several others disagree. If there is consensus that such an entry should be present, so be it. However, it's difficult to establish consensus without discussion. So... here we are. – Luna Santin (talk)22:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose addition Unless the author had a reputable source, and a reason why it should exist in the english Wikipedia, like C'est la vie, then leave it out. Urbandictionary is not a reputable source. --Terrillja (talk) 22:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The lesson I was referring to is that all editors, myself included must follow Wikipedia's policies. I don't get any preferential treatment over any other editor who has also followed the rules.--Terrillja talk02:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose addition. (Disclosure: I'm one of the editors that removed the item.) Although it now is probably moot, I just want to also point out that adding something like that is an absurdity. If something like that is allowed, then should the Portuguese Wikipedia have an entry for the Japanese word for ghost? Should the Punjabi Wikipedia have an entry for the Swahili word for bicep?--A bit iffy (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Counter Point . Punjabi is not spoken in Countries where Swahili is spoken and vice verse. Actually the world doesnt run by the rules of english speaking people ( I mean who only speaks english . VolcanicBasalt (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You guys are behaving as if the english wiki belongs to only english people , I have read the arguments from other user/admins I feel that the edit I made must be included . Otherwise go ahead and remove the content about all other countries from english wikipedia. thier are more english speaking people in India that they are in UK. This term has been used multiple times in Indian English. Try googling the term < Lund India > . Meanwhile I feel that this should be here , so better give me a reason why it should NOT be here before removing it . I am reverting it back —Preceding unsigned comment added by VolcanicBasalt (talk • contribs) 20:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Addition This is a disambiguation page. The note at the bottom of the page decribes the purpose of this page.
"This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title."
Since no page on wikipedia other than this one has had this information on it, this addition does belong. Also if you read the Manual of Style for Disambuguateion pages the format of the entry is wrong.
