Talk:Luna Brothers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved, reliable sources cited in the article (plus The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 18 February 2006, New Straits Times 26 September 2009, io9 23 July 2010 et al., Phillyist 1 December 2010, and Kotaku 3 April 2012) align with Marx Brothers or The Isley Brothers more that the Williams sisters. The only contrary example I could find was Washington City Paper 17 March 2006, which was quoting an unidentified review. -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Brothers → Luna brothers – Decapitalisation as in other articles on siblings, e.g. Williams sisters. relisted --Mike Cline (talk) 11:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC) --The Evil IP address (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. They are known professionally as the "Luna Brothers". That's not the same as the Williams sisters. PC78 (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. How they might prefer the phrase to be styled in professional use is not decisive, for a Wikipedia title. They are, descriptively, the Luna brothers, no matter what else they are billed as. WP:MOSCAPS has a general preference for lower case. Noetica^Tea? 04:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree. The name isn't merely descriptive, and as a professional duo who apparently work under that name it should be capitalised accordingly. It's like a company name or the name of an act IMO, comparable to the Marx Brothers or The Isley Brothers, and you wouldn't decapitalise those titles. PC78 (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support – it appears that they primarily work under their individual names, and though they style themselves capitalized as The Luna Brothers, that styling is not used consistently in independent secondary sources (reviews and such), where the lower-case styling, like WP style, is also common. No reason the to capitalize beyond what MOS:CAPS recommends. Dicklyon (talk) 07:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose―the "Luna Brothers" seems to be more of a title rather than a mere descriptive phrase. Thus, it would seem to be more of a proper noun, unlike the Williams sisters.―New questions? 01:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Luna Brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated

Article needs to be updated. Josh and Jonathan have since fallen out. 104.157.176.160 (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]