Talk:Luigi Settembrini

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Homosexually controversial edit war

Hello, I'm not a homosexual activist, and I am not homophobic either. But encyclopedic information that has been posted by Mardochee should not be reverted, as it contributes something reasonable and fairly relevant to discuss about this individual in a biographical manner on the article. Unless this information is false, there is enough reason to include it.

If there are specific reasons for removal, please, discuss. Vortiene (talk) 22:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With such a name "Italian straight nationalist", the reasons why he can't accept the properly referenced fact that one of his "national heroes" (among hundreds of others who were for sure straight and that the so-called "gay agenda" and "fagtivists" dont try to "make gay") wrote a homoerotic novel and was at least bisexual, are rather clear. I suspect this "new" user to be the same person who, since 2013, makes disruptive edits on pages labeled "LGBT people from Italy" with at least four ranges of IP's you can see in the history of the page about Luigi Settembrini and others like Benvenuto Cellini or Benedetto Varchi : 1. 95.74.242.194, 95.74.55.131, 95.75.11.32... 2. 109.52.188.137, 109.52.144.245 ("Stop your gay agenda"), 109.52.190.79... 3. 151.71.19.217, 151.71.19.184, 151.71.16.147... 4. 217.203.129.187, 217.203.129.165... Mardochee1 (talk) 08:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war by IP's

Here we go... IP beginning by 95 who make disruptive edits without discussion with the same commentary over and over : "improper category". Mardochee1 (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]