Talk:Ludlow Group
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Outdated source material
[edit]Use of the EB 1911 is of dubious value as much of what was written then no longer applies today. Readers should be aware that terminology and thinking have moved on. Any experts wish to have a go at making the appropriate corrections to the article? cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. Added tag to hopefully attract expert attention. Animalparty (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- It needs to be completely rewritten, explaining the historical significance and the current nomenclature that replaces it. Mikenorton (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Stub-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- Ireland articles needing attention
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Start-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Start-Class UK geography articles
- Low-importance UK geography articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs