Talk:Lucy Betts

I noticed this article while New Page patrolling, and it actually should stay. Right now, this is barely a stub, but I saw a whole hour Discovery Channel show on this person, so there are available sources. It just needs attention. J0lt C0la 19:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the fact that it's a stub that concerns me, its that it contains unsourced information about a living person (see WP:BLP). If she hadn't been mentioned in the Harlequin type ichthyosis article, I would have speedied it as a possible attack page. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The sources exist, I just doubt that the page's creator is familiar with Wikipedia standards. Shows are harder to use as sources (in my opinion) than books or websites, but it can become a well sourced, useful article. I've seen the episode a couple of times, and if I see it on the schedule again, I'll tape it so I can use it as a source. J0lt C0la 18:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking that maybe the info in the Harlequin type ichthyosis article might suffice, maybe this should be redirected to that page. J0lt C0la 18:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]