Talk:Lucretia (Rembrandt, 1666)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melisa103.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]- The Intro is really good, its short yet provides the perfect amount if information.
- Rembrandt's interpretation could use more information. It doesn't provide Rembrandt's interpretation but rather Apler's interpretation.
- The description is well written and very informative, it could just use a little more reference. There seems to only be one and it looks like it is only linked to the first half of the section.
- The subject section is really informative and well written. My only critique would be that the last sentence is a little confusing.
- I really enjoyed the influence section and could definitely see the connection between Caravaggio and Rembrandt. I was wondering if there were any other influences beside Caravaggio? How would he have seen Caravaggio's work?
Wiki Education assignment: Baroque Art
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melisa103 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Rmmiller364 (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)