Talk:Lucida Sans Unicode
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sans
[edit]If it's Unicode, then why the heck is it called Lucida Sans Unicode? Jeez, the article should explain that. Awesimo 14:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Linked to Sans-serif; hope this explains it. Nbarth 01:22, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Give metrics?
[edit]You opened the font in FontCreator, and got to Format -> Settings, and got to the Metrics tab, and the metrics are: Typo ascender: 1604 Ascender: 2246 Win ascent: 2246 Descender: -901 Win descent: -901 Line gap: don't know Typo line gap: 168
The original had 243 glyphs, but the Unicode one has 1776 glyphs. 222.233.98.207 (talk) 15:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lucida Sans Unicode. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ascendercorp(dot)com/ - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050208234102/http://monotypeimaging.com/ to http://www.monotypeimaging.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)