Talk:Luca Pozzi

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Issues

There are no good references that show notability. The article is stuffed full of non-encyclopaedic content, including what appears to be a list of every work and every publication by this artist. Needs very severe pruning and some good reputable references from the real world to survive here. Potential nominee for deletion unless much improved. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Valella: Thank you for your message. Some more references have been added: can you confirm me that they can be considered as reputable refereces? Most of the sources are art magazines. Thank you Manumanumanuela (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to review the article prior to any deletion discussion that I might initiate, but only if and when, you feel that all the points noted above have been addressed - the article is still stuffed full of non-encyclopaedic material. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the article stands now it is a strong candidate for deletion. Full of non-encyclopaedic material particularly wikipedia is not meant to be a CV. If you trim out the poorly written descriptions there is little that speaks to notability.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The whole entry is a copy paste from the main and sub pages of http://www.lucapozzi.com/.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since the author seemed to be unwilling or unable to amend this article, I have removed all that extraneous material. I believe that notability is possible to demonstrate (q.v the New Scientist" reference) but much work is still needed. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (I am the author of the uploaded images) --Lucapozzilp (talk) 12:25, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]