Talk:Lubberts effect

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lubbert's effect → Lubberts effect – The effect is named for Dr. G. Lubberts, not Lubbert. Most medical sources use "Lubberts effect" with no apostrophe. SimLibrarian (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: who moved it from Lubberts effect to the current possessive form. DMacks (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unquestionably should be moved back. Probably doesn't even really need an RFM to do it. PianoDan (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator, the doctor is named Lubberts, not Lubbert. JIP | Talk 00:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It shouldn't have been moved in the first place. XOR'easter (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.