Talk:Luís da Silva Mouzinho de Albuquerque

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

A fact from Luís da Silva Mouzinho de Albuquerque appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 June 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a study on chemical analysis by Luís da Silva Mouzinho de Albuquerque (pictured), a Portuguese military officer, scientist and statesman of the 19th century, motivated a special report by two of the most prestigious scientists of the time: Jean-Antoine Chaptal and Joseph-Louis Gay-Lussac?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/June.

Wikipedia

Factual error

On the public page, his bio says he was born in 1892. This is factually wrong; it was 1792. On the edit page, the date is correct. But incorrect on the public page.

This has by now been dealt with, I believe. Rswarbrick (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page requires attribution

There are few, if any, references cited in the text of the page. Plenty of sources exist in the bibliography, but there is no indication of which publication pertains to which piece of information.

tanankyo (talk) 04:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions raised while editing

I went through this text, noticing it on the list of copy-edit candidates. While I personally believe the grammar and general writing style is pretty good now (setting myself up for a fall?), I noticed many ambiguities and questions that I couldn't correct because there aren't really any references, let alone publicly available ones, except in Portuguese and sadly I'm limited to English. So I'm putting them up here in case someone can answer them.

The third paragraph of the "Formative Years and marriage" section describes him working for the Royal Observatory from 1813-1814. Was this upon graduation from the Naval Academy? And what is a portionist?
Were the studies that he abandoned in the following paragraph those at the Observatory?
Are the Anais das Ciências e das Letras, mentioned in the last paragraph of this section, really a newspaper? Or is "journal" the correct word for this situation?
In the 3rd paragraph of the "Studies in Paris" section, a work he presented is described. But "simplification of the study of chemical analysis" sounds surprising - is this a quote? Or maybe a misunderstanding? Otherwise, there should probably be more explanation, since it sounds rather odd!
In final paragraph of the "Exile in France..." section, a battle is described and also two expeditions. Is the Battle of Ladeira part of one of the expeditions mentioned or completely separate?
Also in that paragraph, while he never wanted to be paid more than a subaltern, it doesn't in fact say whether he was or not!
In the third paragraph of the "Expedition to Madeira" section, he was not "able to suffer an attack from the major island". Do we take this to mean that he would have been defeated had such an attack been launched against him? Knowing that, why did he bother to stay?
Is the correct Portuguese abbreviation "Dom Pedro" or "D. Pedro"? Currently we have both, and I don't know to which one to unify.

I hope that putting up this list is the best way to preserve these questions. But I'm not sure whether this is a standard way to do things: maybe a good way to check off these is to answer them with ** etc inline and, once a question has been dealt with, to strike through it?

Rswarbrick (talk) 23:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]