Talk:Low Bandwidth X
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
OK, I added some references to clear up the assertion that LBX loses relative to other approaches, particularly with the addition of the Render extension. JimGettys (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Where ?
[edit]Finally, it was shown that greater speed improvements to X could be obtained for all networked environments with replacement of X's antiquated font system as part of the new composited graphics system, along with care and attention to application and widget toolkit design, particularly care to avoid network round trips and hence latency.
- it was shown - Reference ?
- new composited graphics system - What System ?
- care to avoid network round - Example ? Should i write a new toolkit ?
-- 31.150.181.57 (talk) 09:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Low Bandwidth X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050616080217/http://www.broadwayinfo.com/bwfaq.htm to http://www.broadwayinfo.com/bwfaq.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)