Jump to content

Talk:Low-energy transfer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

references

[edit]

I am the author of the Low enery trasfers page which is under consideration for speedy deletion.

Here are the references to this subject, which I am about to add to the article:


Low energy transfers to the moon were first demonstrated by Dr. Edward Belbruno in 1991 by the Japanese spacecraft Hiten.

The trajectory used by Hiten is a revolutionary new type of trajectory to the moon derived from Weak Stability Boundary Theory.


References:

Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics Princeton University Press. March 2004

Edward Belbruno's text book, published by Princeton University Press, discusses chaos and low energy routes to the Moon. With 250 references


Celestial Mechanics Theory Meets the Nitty-Gritty of Trajectory Design

Article on the book in SIMA News, v37, July/August 2004 by James Chase


Low Energy Trajectories and Chaos: Applications to Astrodynamics and Dynamical Astronomy

Paper on the application of methods of chaos theory to astrodynamics, which have produced new revolutionary types of low energy trajectories in space.

From:New Trends in Astrodynamics and Applications Volume 1065 published December 2005 Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1065: 1–14 (2005). doi: 10.1196/annals.1370.017 Copyright © 2005 by the New York Academy of Sciences


Gravities Rim: Riding Chaos to the Moon

Key public article about how Dr. Edward Belbruno saved the Japanese spacecraft Hiten in 1991 and brought it to the Moon with a new type of transfer to the Moon


Navigating Celestial Currents

Recent cover story in Science News which discusses the work of Edward Belbruno and others, by Erica Klarreich

Above comment added by Spaceroutes, 2006-09-19, at 15:18:26.

Comparison to Farquhar's route

[edit]

This article would be more informative if it provided numbers for delta V savings. In the papers already cited, Belbruno says his routes use the usual TLI burn. So it seems to me his Hiten route only saves .4 km/s, possibly less. I'm a new editor. I want to include title of Farquhar's article in the the footnotes but don't know how.HopDavid (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Don't like footnotes?

[edit]

Any particular reason you removed the footnote style reference? Because if so, you should probably remove the <ref> tag. --Vonfraginoff 21:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wants an image

[edit]

If there was ever an article in need of a picture, it's this one. Anybody have a really squiggly line handy? Does the Galileo E->J transfer count? ----

Ed, ease up on the purple prose

[edit]

Ed, I understand that this is a big deal in some senses, but you can't just call your own work "revolutionary" in an encyclopedia. It's an advance in orbital design technique, not Copernicus. Unless you can cite a source not authored by you (or someone closely connected with you) calling it revolutionary, it ought to be dropped entirely. Even if such a source existed, the article should refer to the citation as naming it "revolutionary". One satellite does not a revolution make. --Vonfraginoff (talk) 13:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delta-V vs time

[edit]

There is reference to saving time in the article but no quantification of the time spent, perhaps someone with more knowledge of this transfer method could expand on how much duration is added to a journey to some of the example orbital transfer points?

(User:BaSH PR0MPT, currently can't get into my account until I get home, apologies for IPness.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.69.174 (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, how does it work?

[edit]

Wouldn't it be nice if the the article could explain a bit how it actually works, instead of just giving a explanation of its effect / what it is good for?193.170.127.132 (talk) 10:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC) MansourJE (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New proposal to go to Mars planet

[edit]

New proposal to go to Mars which uses low energy and is much cheaper and would allow for escaping the need for timing and scheduling launch windows.

More information to read this proposal:

http://phys.org/news/2014-12-ballistic-capture-cheaper-path-mars.html#jCp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjesfahani (talkcontribs) 04:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Low-energy transfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Low-energy transfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Low-energy transfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]