Talk:Love Crime
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The plot description is wrong, surely?
[edit]Just seen this movie, and the plot description doen’t match my experience. Firstly, Christine doesn’t “discover” Philippe’s irregualr accounting - she knows of the issue from the get-go, and has allowed the matter to ride while having the affair with him; however, she’s angling for a promotion to the U.S., so is going to drop him, so she sets up a scheme to cover her back and expose the fraud if he doesn’t return the money. Secondly, and more importantly, the plot concocted by Isabelle is "all" a scam - it doesn’t “become” more difficult for her than she anticipated - she anticipates everything. The mental breakdown was contrived, and all the clues planted by her were done to build up the circumstantial “evidence” for a case against her; having been (deliberately) arrested and (deliberately) sent to prison, she then (deliberately) contrives to un-pick the case against her and load it onto Philippe - cementing this by planting evidence (the shawl), directing him into how to tamper with the evedience in Christine’s file, and exposing his fraud and the destruction of Christine’s letter to the Police. Finally, it misses the fact that having killed Christine, framed with Philippe (who colluded in Isabelle’s humiliation by Christine in front of her colleagues at the party), been exonerated by the authorities in spite of being guilty and been rewarded with Christine’s old job, Isabelle fails to get away with the perfect crime, because her colleague Daniel has uncovered the truth about her apparent break-down and prescription drug dependency - the pills were placebos, and Isabelle was lucid at all times. Daniel, it is implied, is as willing to exploit this knowledge for his own advancement as Christine was to exploit Isabelle’s experties at the start of the film. Jock123 (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Love Crime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728223053/http://www.labiennale.org/en/cinema/festival/lineup/off-sel/venezia69 to http://www.labiennale.org/en/cinema/festival/lineup/off-sel/venezia69/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)