Jump to content

Talk:LoveStoned

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLoveStoned was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
March 4, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:LoveStoned/I Think She Knows/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Review

[edit]

Hey, I'm reviewing the article. Best. — R2 00:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • "including reaching" - bad wording.
    • Removed "reaching".
      • Good

Background

[edit]
  • Redundant use of the word "also".
    • Got it.
  • "in regards of the unexpected switch" - bad wording.
  • "the back story behind the song" - bad wording.
    • Do you have suggestions for both?
      • Done

Reception

[edit]
  • "The song received positive reception" - Not needed, the reader can make up their own minds from the reviews presented.
  • "upon release it was downloaded 39,000 times" - Should go in the chart performance section
    • Done [on both].
      • Good

Chart performance

[edit]
  • "The track reached the top 10 in less than 7 European countries" - Odd way of putting it.
    • Do I remove it?
  • Not sure why you need to say "position" all the time, remove a few.
    • I think I got it.
  • Any info on certifications/sales anywhere?
    • Nope, no certifications.
      • All good.

Music vid

[edit]
  • "The video was directed by Robert Hales" - Stubby, join to another sentence.
    • I think I know what you mean, but I want to be sure.
      • Done, I aloo removed the attribution of the newspaper because it's hardly a controversial issue.

Charts

[edit]
  • There are several unsourced charts on there, you should be able to find situations.
    • Done.

References

[edit]
  • The formatting of the references section is not ideal. Publishers are linked on ever occasion pretty much. Publishers only need wikilinking once, on the first ref number they appear in. Some publishing dates do not have brackets over them.
    • Done. Also, I have cite ref and cite news in the article.


Generally a nice piece of work. These issues shouldn't take long to address. I have the page watchlisted BTW. When this is done I'll give it a second read through. — R2 18:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I hope I've addressed your concerns. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's looking real good. Tomorrow I'll give the prose another read over though. — R2 00:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments

[edit]
  • Regarding "The song includes a string section" of the lead, which part of the song is this in, or is it in both parts?
    • Its in both parts.

OK, well the article is good now, so it passes :) — R2 14:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LoveStoned. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on LoveStoned. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LoveStoned. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:LoveStoned&oldid=1208599416"