This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
this article has the same degree of "research" as all my articles, but due to the nature of the modern world, as a contemporary figure most references are online. As the same material is viewable to anyone, apart from the desire to assemble the information this is no more original than any work. It is frustrating that if using a single source it is accused of plagiarism or breaching copyright, if using two it is accused of insufficient references, but if using multiple it is then accused of creating something as original research. There seems to be no ideal other than adopting university dissertation style which is often inappropriate to the subject matter--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is no issue with citing online sources. The issue is there are a number of claims made in the article that aren't supported with inline citations so its hard to know what is supported with a reliable source and what isn't. This is a biography of a living person and all claims need to be supported with a reliable source that can be verified by other editors. I see that you have created a lot of articles which is fantastic, but supporting each statement you make in these articles with a reliable source would improve article quality and make it easier for other editors. Best wishes Cult of Green (talk) 00:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
