Talk:Louis Riel (comics)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 01:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Good article review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article? for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- 6 images: File:Battle of Batoche Print by Seargent Grundy.jpg, File:Louis Riel.jpg, File:Johnamacdonald1870.jpg, and File:Thomas Bland Strange.jpg are Commons-hosted Public Domain, File:Kobo ereader touch black front.JPG is Commons-hosted tagged as cc-by-sa, and File:Rielcomicstripcover.jpg includes a Fair Use Rationale.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Comments/Questions
- In "Background", "in the end decided to "wing it"." - this appears to be an uncited quote. Quotes are typically used when it is important to capture the authors exact words (like explaining someone's opinion) but I don't see why a quote is useful here.
- "wing it" were the words Brown used in the Two Handed Man interview, and since it was kind of slangy, I thought it would be best to put it in quotes. Looking at it now, I think it would be better to change it to "improvise" anyways. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- This is not part of the GA criteria but I will ask it here anyways. Is the "Works cited" section supposed to be alphabetical by author's last name? It appears that way except for 4 entries.
- That would be an embarrassing oversight on my part. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Why spell role as "rôle"?
- It's the obnoxious way I happen to spell it in real life. Technically, it's an "accepted" way to write it in English. If anyone were to change it, I wouldn't lift a finger to stop it, though. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know how I missed those. Thanks for pointing them out. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Conclusion
This is an excellent article. I have passed it as a Good Article and I would support it as Featured Article if nominated.