Talk:Louis Michel Antoine Sahuc

Military history: Biography / European / French / Early Modern / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Pretty good - I've omitted the detailed regimental strengths, because they just seemed to break up the flow of the text and make the text hard to read. One missing citation - right at the end, about the Arc de Triomphe - and two confusing ones; refs #3 and #4 are to "Arnold", but it's not clear if this is Marengo & Hohenlinden (2005) or Napoleon Conquers Austria (1995), both of which are in the bibliography. Shimgray | talk | 21:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for assessing this article and catching my goof-ups. I removed one of the Arnold refs, thus removing any ambiguity. It was never used anyway. The strength numbers did seem to be awkward. A few months ago, one editor (I think Ian Rose, but I may be mistaken) chided me for using the form "Author, p 100" so I changed it to "Author, 100". Now I see you like my original form better. Is there a published standard for citations? Djmaschek (talk) 04:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]