This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is related to the Harold B. Lee Library holdings. Learn more about this collaborative project to improve coverage related to the BYU library's holdings, and how you can help here.Harold B. Lee LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/Harold B. Lee LibraryTemplate:WikiProject Harold B. Lee LibraryHarold B. Lee Library-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
Louis C. Midgley is part of WikiProject Brigham Young University, an attempt to write quality articles about Brigham Young University. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Brigham Young UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
The opening of the article was slightly POV, referring to anti-Mormons and indepth studies. Midgley uses the term anti-Mormon without restraint, but on Wikipedia that label should be used only in rare cases (to describe Ed Decker, for example, or for early self-identified "anti-Mormons").
The rest of the article I mostly restructured and rearranged.
The Ostling's refer to him in Mormon America as one of the outstanding defenders of orthodox Mormon history. I'll add the citation when I have the book in front of me. I should also check Claudia Bushman's Contemporary Mormonism to see if he's mentioned there. Carneadiiz (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. What I found about him in Mormon America doesn't really fit a bio. There's also a reference in Breaking the Mormon Code to him being really nasty, but that book is self-published. Bushman doesn't mention him. Carneadiiz (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I included a bunch of details about a controversy over a Historiography article, including Midgley calling its editing censorship (possibly informed by another Sunstone article). But based on this, another historian, Thomas Alexander described Midgley as misrepresenting the situation and being obtuse. I think it's a good example of the way others view Midgley, and Alexander's comments are in a peer-reviewed Dialogue article. At the same time, I'm not sure if I'm unduly emphasizing this event (but it's one of my few RS on Midgley's "style"). Thoughts? Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
