Talk:Lot No. 249/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Drown Soda (talk · contribs) 22:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Background
During the nineteenth-century, Napoleon's Egyptian campaign (1798–1801), combined with the translation of the Rosetta Stone, lead many Europeans to become fascinated with Egyptian art, architecture, science and religion, a fascination that became known as Egyptomania. Egyptomania lead to mummies becoming an "enduring theme in Western fiction"... These two events lead to a late Victorian era "fascination with the Egyptian undead," popularized by H. Rider Haggard's novel Cleopatra (1889)
-- "lead" should be past-tense "led" in these instances."Lot. No. 249" was not the first work of English literature to include a reanimated mummy; that distinction goes to Jane Webb's The Mummy! (1827), a science fiction novel heavily influenced by Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818).
-- Probably should be referenced given the type of claim made.
Themes
These circumstances lead to a sub-genre of Gothic fiction that Emily Adler refers to as the "Imperial Gothic," which is concerned with British fears of being invaded by foreign cultures.
-- "lead"-->"led"
Adaptations
The Tales from the Darkside segment contains slapstick and slasher film elements.
--should support this with a reference.
References All here appears in order; shortened footnotes are appropriately used for book sources.
Conclusion: The article appears in very good shape and is mostly meticulously-referenced, aside from a few instances. I feel it qualifies for GA status, though the few things I pointed out above should be looked over/addressed. Overall well-written and broad enough in scope to meet the requirements; just needs minor tweaking. ✓ Pass --Drown Soda (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Drown Soda: I addressed your concerns. Thanks so much for your help!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 22:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS