Talk:Lost Blue Bucket Mine

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

location citations

GNIS catalogs a location called Blue Bucket Mine at 44°53′01″N 118°46′46″W / 44.8834854°N 118.7794070°W / 44.8834854; -118.7794070 according to "Blue Bucket Mine". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior. Retrieved 2009-01-22.. The suggested GNIS search ("GNIS query "Blue Bucket Mine"".) gives three results: one each in Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona. The last is out of the question for an Oregon Trail legend, but the Nevada location is at 41°21′23″N 118°18′29″W / 41.3562891°N 118.3079317°W / 41.3562891; -118.3079317 (Blue Bucket Mine, Nevada), only 394.5 kilometres (245.1 mi) south of the Oregon location. Perhaps all of this should be in the article? —EncMstr (talk) 01:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada?

But they were on a spur route of the Oregon Trail. Life does weird things, but Nevada?

dino (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I'm confused by the confusion about the coords. The mine this article is about may or may not have even existed. (And in fact was never a "mine" per se, but simply a place where gold was found.) Thus I don't think it should have a coord template, which implies the legendary mine in fact exists. There are three actual mines in the U.S. that have been named "Blue Bucket Mine" over the years. It's quite likely that they were named for completely different reasons than the legend described in this article. My purpose for linking to the GNIS query was to back up the assertion that there are three mines so-called, and to preempt any confusion the existence of these mines might cause. i.e. "What do you mean the mine is 'lost'? It's in Grant County."

Also to say its existence "traces" to 1845 is poor wording, sorry. The word "traces" in this usage is rather colloquial, and I think my solution was better. Also, single years generally aren't linked. But I'll take this off my watchlist as I don't feel like edit warring over it. Good luck. Katr67 (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lost Blue Bucket Mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]