Talk:Lost Adams Diggings
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
2008 Comment
[edit]For all that is written about the Lost Adams diggings, we should have a well-documented article, with specific in-line citations giving page numbers and so forth. There are a number of books mentioned, but no inline citations telling exactly where and in which book specific facts are detailed. Plazak (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Deleted unsourced opinion
[edit]I deleted the sentence that said "Only Doble's book adequately describes..." There is no citation to give us the source of this judgment. It may be the opinion of the person who added that sentence to the article. I would have no problem with the statement if it can be attributed to some authoritative source: a historian? A book review? Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 18:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class New Mexico articles
- Low-importance New Mexico articles
- WikiProject New Mexico articles
- Start-Class United States History articles
- Unknown-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- WikiProject United States articles