Talk:Los Angeles Metro Bus

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Buses Mid‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled

I'm wondering who wrote that article, but there are some information missing. The article is partially filled in. Plus, I would like to post this article for cleaning. Also, I would like to see if the text of the article itself meets the Wikipedia's copyright policy (I know where the source for that article is located. I think somebody had managed to extract information from the metro.net website. thanks.

Recommendation: Merge Articles

I recommend we merge the two wiki articles Metro Local and List of current Metro Local routes. They contain almost the same information.

I'm not sure we even need one article, given that the information is easily available (with minimal research effort) on Metro's website [http:\\metro.net], a website which is kept current by a staff.

Jcovarru (talk) 15:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service change premature edits

@PuppyCatBree I've noticed that you've made changes effective as of mid-December in late October/early November. These changes seem extremely premature. I think it would be okay to add a note that this route will be changing in the future, but fully changing or deleting now seems too soon. I might also suggest using the "show by date" template which would allow you to input the information now, and have it autoswap the day of the service change. I'd ask that you please revert your premature changes. RickyCourtney (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RickyCourtney , I know where we are getting this information. The five Service Council meetings. My South Bay council actually confirmed that Line 550 will be discontinued with Limes 205 and 246 replacing portions of the soon-to-be-former Line 550. Proof: https://docs.google.com/gview?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.metro.net%2Fboard%2FAgendas%2F2022%2F11_november%2F20221103asba.pdf&embedded=true

PuppyCatBree (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PuppyCatBree I'm not saying that the information is incorrect. The key phrase there is "soon-to-be-former" -- the line exists today -- and will for another 30+ days. So it seems premature that the route is already missing from this page. RickyCourtney (talk) 00:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose merging Metro Rapid into Los Angeles Metro Bus. I think that it does not make sense to have Metro Rapid have its own article, since it is not really a distinct system from Metro Bus; it is just a few lines which are more express service than bus rapid transit that do not really exist separately from the rest of the Metro Bus system. Furthermore, the Metro Rapid page even defers to the main Metro Bus article and lacks a lot of proper sourcing other than the sources for the services; a lot of this info is duplicated already on the main Metro Bus article already. Any relevant and useful information like history and background about Metro Rapid could easily be trimmed down with proper sourcing and summarized in the Metro Bus article. Does anyone else want to share their opinions on this? --OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, perhaps even, this article could be repurposed into a list article of all the transit routes (Metro Bus, Metro Local, Metro Rail, and Metro Busway) like for example the article List of transit routes in Minneapolis–Saint Paul. After all, this article is already pretty much a list article in and of itself. --OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:43, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support folding the Metro Rapid page into Los Angeles Metro Bus page. When the Metro Rapid page was created, it made a lot more sense to have it as a standalone page. But with Metro largely abandoning the brand it no longer does. However, I don't support a omnibus "List of routes" article. RickyCourtney (talk) 22:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're making a merge proposal you should tag both articles to get some actual feedback.

as for the proposal, it's not the worst idea. Metro Rapid was intended to be a lot more than it turned out to be, and so I'm not sure it really needs an entire separate article. There's only four routes. They can easily be covered by a section in the list of routes, with some intro text to describe the in that section.

Conversely, though, New York's Select Bus Service, which is comparable in nature, does have its own article. oknazevad (talk) 15:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation:Ridership column

I recommend that a ridership column be added for the transit routes. There is a website that has the ridership stats for all the routes. Ex696 (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]