Talk:Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Sources

http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/la-river-supreme-court-opinion-narrow-or-broad-reaching/

Review Experts Terry Tamminen

Steve Fleischli (NRDC Director and Senior Attorney, Water Program) http://www.nrdc.org/about/staff/steve-fleischli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captcrunch1 (talk • contribs) 03:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EPA's Rule

Take a look at the EPA's Water Transfers Rule issued in 2008 here. You might want to add something about it. Aarf613 (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 29 Peer Review

Hi Guys, I reviewed your article for the April 29 assignment. Really good job overall! I was impressed. -I thought that in the parties section you may want to provide more of a description of the two parties (who they are, jurisdiction, etc). Currently I felt that the section just talked about details of the case.

-I also think you may want to try to combine or streamline the issues and background section. I thought they contained similar information.

-Add links to the further reading section or take it out.

-I thought the info you provided on the previous cases was really good, but is it too much for this articles topic? Should it be more of a quick summary in your article and then a dedicated separate article?

-Under arguments you only provided the NRDC argument. What was the districts argument or reasoning?

-Under see also you may want to put up the links to the parties web sites or wiki pages.

Overall a really good looking article. I hope my review is helpful. Kaylapaschal (talk) 00:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A few general comments in addition to Kayla's points above...

- Overall really engaging format. Good use of images to support complex or more geographic material

- Minor edit: you have two #1s in the list

Jtreetree (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Nice Article! Here are couple things to consider below.

- As mentioned above the South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians section is a bit lengthy. You might want to consider summarizing and adding a hyperlink to a page with more details if the reader wants further information.

-In the Parties section you start discussing the arguments, should this be in arguments section?

Overall the article flows very well and has a nice format.

bahodges —Preceding undated comment added 06:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

General comments by Stuartyeates

Please see general comments by User:Stuartyeates on articles generated by this class at Education Program talk:University of San Francisco/Environmental Law (Spring 2013)#Feedback_on_the_articles. Please respond there if you have any questions or comments. Dcoetzee 01:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]