Talk:Loretta Jones

Loretta Jones has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
August 10, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Hollyoaks Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hollyoaks task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Chaosdruid, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 25 February 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Child killer

Just a note since the storyline involving Loretta being a killer has been dropped. Please leave things including her real name and the killer category, just until we find out what Channel 4 plan to do to the storyline. W93 (talk) 15:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it doesn't air the killer peice will stay forever... I hope it goes ahead in some form. Great for Loretta though, how notable she became in the space of a month. lol Raintheone (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Loretta Jones/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: liquidluck✽talk 05:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DoneThe most prominent issue with the article is that it lacks a critical reception section. Please find and add reviews, which might discuss the character, her storyline, or Walton's acting (as examples).

Other than that,

DoneDelink occupation, university, relationship, bullied, killed, kiss, and death per WP:OVERLINK.

Characterisation

DoneCombine the second and third paragraphs in the lead.
DoneThat Loretta is unique as a stereotype-defying stripper needs a citation. Alternatively, you could say something like "Loretta does not conform to dumb blonde stereotypes and expresses interest in bird watching and documentaries."
Done"as many every day females attend university" - does Loretta attend university or have a secondary job? If so, this should be mentioned in the lead.

Comment - Loretta does not attend university, nor has she said on-screen or Walton stated that she has, she was comparing her characters interests in bird watching, roman factual documentaries with uni students. Comparing the two in her statement was showing that her character isn't the blonde stripper stereotype.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 00:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done"[...] in stark contrast to her every day life look." -What is her everyday look?
Done"Loretta then began a secret romance with Jake, opting to deceive her friends, believing had been mislead and like with Ravi, saw the good in him." -I'm not sure what this sentence is trying to say.

Child killer controversy

DoneI'd suggest changing "child killer" to "child murderer" in all instances.
DoneAdd the basics of the Bulger murder to Child killer controversy so that readers can understand the similarities.
DoneThe last sentence in the article needs a citation

Storylines

DoneThe subsection (2008-) can be removed, as there is no other subsection section.
Done"During her job, Loretta meets Dom." -This is confusing, because earlier in the article it says they break up when Dom finds out about her job. If they met while Loretta was working, wouldn't he already know?
Done"where she and Dom" -> "when she and Dom"
DoneAdd a sentence or clause about the end of Don and Loretta's relationship.
Done"towards sister Leila" whose sister?
DoneThe lead says her storylines concern prejudice, but I don't see mention of it here.
Done"[...] and Loretta soon avoids the subject." Why?

Result

~~Pending until April 6, 2010.~~ If the content comments are fixed by then, I'll go over the prose/grammar. Again, the most important issue is the lack of a reception section. Good luck! liquidluck✽talk 05:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pass. Thank you for all your work on the article- it must have been hard trying to find sources discussing a character on a soap. I've gone over the article and copy-edited, but you're welcome to alter my changes. Attaining FA status may be difficult because of its "high quality" reliable source requirement, but the content generally looks good (though you may want a better copy-editor if you do want FA). I believe the article meets the GA requirements and am passing. liquidluck✽talk 23:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1] - Jaci Stephen praises Loretta's exit.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 03:31, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]