Talk:Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Animation: Looney Tunes Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Define "adequately covered"

One article for an ongoing annual series of box set collections is simply not enough. The articles for the individual volumes must be kept intact. Steelbeard1 (talk) 02:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full lists of the contents are not necessary and not in keeping with the standard method of listing DVDs. The special nature of these releases is the only reason the full Looney Tunes Golden Collection article is needed at all, because it crosses many Looney Tunes properties. One could argue, though, that it could just as easily be reduced to a single paragraph or two within the main Looney Tunes article, which is how most DVD releases are handled.

This is an on-going release, for now, but there is no guarantee that the collections will continue. The version of the main article that I did, which was reverted, covered all the pertinent and encyclopedic details of each released parsed from the individual articles quite well. AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been saved. Sorry, AnmaFinotera. Steelbeard1 (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Steelbeard1 (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]