Jump to content

Talk:Long Meg Mine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 1 millionth tonne - The year of this is reported elsewhere as being 1961. The reference I give however was published in 1960 and refers to the event happening in 1959. Does anyone know if this is a mistake? -- Steventee 22:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A number of points:

  • The metric tonne was not used in the British minerals processing industries before 1970: the unit in use was the Imperial ton, which was equal to 1.016047 tonnes. The sources in question say "tons", so why say "tonnes"?
  • The United Sulfuric Acid Corporation plant at Widnes, which took most of the Long Meg output between 1954 and 1972, used its millionth ton (not tonne) of anhydrite in September 1959, and presumably received it some time earlier. The date in question clearly refers to that customer only, and not the entire product of the mine.
  • It is incorrect to say that the current owner of the mine is unknown, because I know it. I believe the owner also knows it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.241.95 (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long Meg Mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]