Talk:Londonstani

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've altered this article so that it concerns the book "Londonstani" by Gautam Malkani rather than the term, which hasn't truly entered into the language (and in fact isn't used once in the book itself).

The book does deserve a page, as it is on many UK bestseller lists.

Vrymor 18:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The plot summary reads like a 6th grade book report, especially the ending, I don't think the write understood the book at all. It should be cleaned up.

Yes, the summary is poor and the writer of the article clearly missed the point of the novel. I took the time to clarify the ending and correct some other details that were just wrong, but I did not take the time to re-write the whole thing. This article needs more work.

Cor11 10:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sales figures

I removed the paragraph which disputed the sales figures in Private Eye, as no sources were provided for the various assertions. While there may be very good reasons to doubt the sales figures given in the magazine, I don't think adding unsourced comments to the article helps matters.217.155.20.163 19:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside, what would be considered a "good" sales figure for a first-time novel by a non-celebrity author? How usual is it for first-timers to get the massive advance payment and heavy promotion that Malkani got for Londonstani? 217.155.20.163 19:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The plot

The plot sounds like its written by a 10th grader, seriously needs to be improved, with inline citations. --Street Scholar (talk) 10:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't you? Drmies (talk) 21:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]