Talk:London Country North East/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting Review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

This looks to be quite a reasonable article, so I'll commence the detailed review. At this point I will only be highlighting "problems", if any. Pyrotec (talk) 11:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A reasonable article. The WP:Lead provides a resonable introduction but is not too good as a summary of the main points. It is barely adequate and could do with some expansion (I suggesting doubling in size)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Quite reasonable. The second paragraph of Creation and Early History talks about several companies, but I presume "company" refers to LNCE (it makes sense, but it aught to be clarified)

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article needs a bit of work on the lead, mostly, but overall it is of GA-standard. I'm therefore awarding GA status. 08:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)