Jump to content

Talk:London Borough of Sutton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weather

[edit]

Surely some of the conversions of fahrenheit to celsius are wrong? Look closely. i would correct myself, but am in internet cafe and only got coupla minutes left of credit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.16.130 (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Controversy

[edit]

Removed part on Roberts/Spirling book: article is about London Borough of Sutton, not its waste collection or its council officers. Also, "Recent Controversy" seems a stretch: no actual controversy has resulted, and discussion seems like political point-scoring. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotater (talk • contribs) 22:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Friendly?

[edit]

The article states "Sutton is a friendly community". How is this quantified? Deckchair 13:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be. I took the liberty of removing that paragraph. Hammer Raccoon 22:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural Attractions etc

[edit]

At present, there are only three of these included. Do historical sites (like Carew Manor, or the parks at the sites of Oaks House and Nonsuch Palace; not to mention Whitehall house, which is fairly well known, Carshalton Ponds, etc, quite besides minor historical/artistic sites, and the libraries (eg Cheam, Wallington) not count? (If they count I will add them). (RJ Gordon (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The parks and open spaces are listed under Sutton parks and open spaces, I'd probably add minor historical and artistic sites if they have any notability. I'd probably list libraries separately as local authority amenities. Generally, it's better to introduce these things as a couple of paragraphs of prose, rather than lists. At an early stage in an article's development, that can be difficult. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weather info is wrong

[edit]

Title says it all! The Summer temps should be around the 20C mark. Compare with the temps on the London page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.160.20 (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

[edit]

How is it justified to use a reference from a lettings website in the page, even as a placeholder whilst a proper citation is found.? Surely not a [WP:RS] ? IMHO nothing is better than something un-reliable, so please revert User:A P Monblat See http://www.net-lettings.co.uk/london-property-news/articles/sutton-the-third-safest-borough-in-london-3134 SovalValtos (talk) 09:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought [better source needed] was for precisely this sort of situation. However, I don't feel strongly about this point, and will revert. A P Monblat (talk) 10:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Better source now found and added. A P Monblat (talk) 11:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reversion. Several references come from the borough press office or Comms. dept. Are they independent and is there a COI? SovalValtos (talk) 11:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for raising this, but I don't see a problem here. It is a Govt body, and all it is doing in this case is reporting facts from a polling organisation. A P Monblat (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on London Borough of Sutton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:London_Borough_of_Sutton&oldid=1212104097"