Talk:London Apprentice

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

It is requested that an image or photograph of London Apprentice be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Cornwall may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Origin of Name

Does anyone know the story of the unusual name of this hamlet? Richerman (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having grown up in St Austell I have often wondered - and now have just found this [1] which is at least a start. DuncanHill (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Duncan. I didn't really follow the first answer too well as it talks about apprentices but gives no reason why it should be London. The second one sounds feasible though. I was trying to put on the coordinates but couldn't work out exactly where it was on google earth. Any chance of you doing it as you're from the area? Richerman (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit rubbish with the coordinates templates! I'll see if I can get a grid ref if that helps. DuncanHill (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's in grid square SX0050. DuncanHill (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And here is a link to Google Maps for it [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by DuncanHill (talk • contribs) 15:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for that. The way I do it is to use google earth, hover over the right area and read off the coordinates at the bottom. Then there is one template that relates to those that I use and just copy the numbers in. It took me ages to work out how to do it but I eventually found one template that I could use. I should be able to find it now so when I've done it, if you have a look at the template it should be a bit clearer, hopefully. Richerman (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, sorted. Good bit of teamwork there, thanks for your help. When I finally got there it was named on GE anyway - doh! Richerman (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone has added a section to say that the place was named after the inn but no evidence ahs been provided. From the links given above there is is obviously evidence elsewhere that says differently, although I don't have access to it, so I think that the section about it being named after an inn should be deleted. Richerman (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Parish?

Where it says "in the historical parish of St Austell" should that be "historically in the parish of St Austell", or have I misunderstood the meaning of the sentence? Richerman (talk) 10:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm- good question! London Apprentice is (I think) in the unparished area of St Austell, and would have been (probably still is) in the ecclesiastical parish of St Austell. I'll do some digging to see what I can find. DuncanHill (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Duncan Richerman (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, according to the Cornwall interactive mapping service ([3]) London Apprentice is in the St Austell unparished area, and from what I can make out at the Diocese of Truro website it's in the St Austell ecclesiastical parish - haven't worked out a way to cite these yet. DuncanHill (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are the templates at Template:Cite web any use? Richerman (talk) 11:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, there is no way to link to the map output on the Cornwall interactive mapping service. For the ecclesiastical parish, I didn't find any specific reference - my result would be classed as synthesis for WP purposes. DuncanHill (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this link work for you? [4]. DuncanHill (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see your problem now, it goes there but doesn't display the map Richerman (talk) 12:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you link it to the main website with some instructions on what to click on from there? Richerman (talk) 12:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using the External link in the article for St Austell Parish I got to here and here I'm just not sure if after 1849 means up to the present day. Richerman (talk) 12:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Past Tense

Can someone please enlighten me as to why this article is written entirely in the past tense? Does London Apprentice no longer exist? Was a small nuclear bomb dropped on it (but the BBC didn't report it)? 92.237.136.80 (talk) 23:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've changed the text to what I think it meant - however I'm not sure if the inn is still there (it probably is) and whether there are any mines at all that are still operational (probably not). I would have thought some of the residents worked in the china clay industry too, and I think there is still some activity there, but I wouldn't know whether any of them work there - that's the problem with unreferenced articles. And I think this answer is now probably longer than the article itself :) Richerman (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Apprentice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111021053150/http://www.claytrails.co.uk/TrailPentewan.html to http://www.claytrails.co.uk/TrailPentewan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Apprentice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716093716/http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/our-woods/Pages/wood-details.aspx?wood=4357&site=Kings-Wood to http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/our-woods/Pages/wood-details.aspx?wood=4357&site=Kings-Wood

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]