Jump to content

Talk:Lomandra filiformis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Identification

[edit]

These current two photographs are not L. filiformis, which i know very well as a professional field botanist in eastern Victoria, on & off since the late 1980s. Please refer to here, here, here,here & here, for examples.

Looks like Lomandra longifolia only in flower not in fruit, and/or a weak form or Lomandra longifolia subsp. exilis. In fruit, as can be seen in the photos here & here, the individual fruits are much 'chunkier' than individual flowers, making the inflorescence much 'fatter' looking (sorry not the best words—busy!) Cheers. PS. if i have time i'll come back, perhaps with good photos of my own, and do some work editing. ——--macropneuma 06:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]