Talk:Lokai (company)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sabbatessa.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI

User:Mduvekot, I looked at User:LokaiPR's edits. Most of them are small tweaks and the POV edit was reverted by User:Jytdog. Given that it was fixed, is the COI template actually needed? -Reagle (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted [1]. Mduvekot (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it. The page needs actual, well, you know, work done. It is a poor encyclopedia article but a nice advertisement. User:Reagle are you not editing directly here due to some COI of your own? If so you need to disclose that. Thx Jytdog (talk) 18:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jytdog, I have nothing to do with the company nor agree with your belief that all WikiEd activity is inherent COI. In any case, I'd suggest using the template most appropriate to specific concerns rather than the moot COI one -Reagle (talk) 20:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just asking why you didn't make the edit yourself. It was odd. The academic issue is not relevant here. Jytdog (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jytdog, ah, I asked here because I didn't understand why Mduvekot added the template after the problem was already fixed. It looks like it is resolved now though. -Reagle (talk) 21:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained, [2] it was a simple matter of courtesy. I wasn't sure that you had noticed that someone, seemingly acting on behalf of the subject, had altered the content of the page. I stumbled upon it while doing NPP review with a set of search terms that usually help identify contributions by undisclosed paid editors. Mduvekot (talk) 21:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]