Talk:Logistics specialist

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Logistics specialist article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

92 is not an MOS

You can really tell a Sailor who didn't serve as an IA or in a purple billet wrote this thing. If you Navy types are going to say something comparative about the Army, at least get it somewhat right. 92 is not an MOS, its a Career Management Field (CMF) for MOSes in the Quartermaster Corps, much like how 35 is the CMF for Military Intelligence and 18 is the CMF for Special Forces. The Navy LS (and before that SK) rating is roughly equivalent to 92A, 92Y, 92F and 92Z on the enlisted side since the Navy doesn't differentiate as much as the Army, Marine Corps. Anyway, I'm going to correct it by changing it to reflect what a CMF is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.151.63 (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]