Talk:Locomotive

Bimodal locomotive

A separate section,if not a separate article, about locomotives that are build to run as an electric or as a diesel electric would be useful. Peter Horn.2 (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

More explanation needed

Reading this article, I have no idea what the difference is between the subject and other types of trains. The article ought to be edited to highlight this difference.--Mr. Guye (talk) 21:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The opening sentence tries to provide this, but I agree it is not super clear. Would something like "A locomotive is a railway vehicle that hauls a train of freight- or passenger- carrying vehicles. It provides the motive power and does not itself carry freight or passengers." be any clearer? Railfan23 (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Literally, a "locomotive" is simply a self-moving vehicle. The name doesn't imply either railway use or hauling other vehicles. Murdock and Trevithick's first locomotive vehicles weren't either.

This article ought to make clear the subset relation between the common implied meaning (only for railway haulage is the term in common use) and the literal. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Locomotive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110415125004/http://www.museumwales.ac.uk/en/rhagor/article/trevithic_loco to http://www.museumwales.ac.uk/en/rhagor/article/trevithic_loco/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Av-LamRJaRbXZXaFYwYVlPREE/view?usp=sharing
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5nE9m87Xm?url=http://www.steam.dial.pipex.com/ to http://www.steam.dial.pipex.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Salamanca

The first commercially successful steam locomotive, Salamanca, might be worthy of being put as the/a main image on the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doomotron (talk • contribs) 00:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

etymology

The etymology section states that "the term locomotive engine... was first used in 1814" but it was certainly in use in 1812-1813 as evidenced by the publication of a patent Granted to William Chapman, of Murton-House, in the County of Durham, Civil Engineer, and Edward Walton Chapman, of Willington-Ropery ... Rope-maker, (dated the 30th Day of December, 1812.) for Their Invention of "a Method, Or Methods, of Facilitating the Means, and Reducing the Expence of Carriage on Railways and Other Roads." Published by the Great Britain Patent Office, 1813. It contains three instances of the term loco-motive engine https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Copy_of_the_Specification_of_a_Patent_Gr/jSM4AQAAMAAJ?gbpv=1 Bodrugan (talk) 09:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Obtuse sentence needs revision

Article says, "Their inadequacy had increased with the existence of petrol and diesel locomotives." This sentence seems invalid and obtuse. Did the editor mean to say, "Petrol and diesel locomotives were more efficient than benzene"? (Appletonclack (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC))