Talk:Lockwood Aircraft
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockwood Aircraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Where's Leza?
[edit]There is no mention of "Leza" insofar as I can determine at http://aircam.com/. The Contact page states: "The AirCam is back home at Lockwood Aircraft Corp." Perhaps this article should be moved to "Lockwood Aircraft". —QuicksilverT @ 18:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Aw, shucks, I went ahead and did it. It turns out there were broken wikilinks already pointing to "Lockwood Aircraft", just waiting for the move to be made. Now the article should be cleaned up to improve the history and show the past involvement of Antonio Leza and how and when the name change happened. —QuicksilverT @ 19:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Stub-Class aviation articles
- Stub-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles