Talk:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Australian procurement

Military history: Aviation / National / South Pacific C‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	National militaries task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Australian procurement is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Merger discussion

I don't see a reason to have this page exist separately outside of the section it already has at Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement#Australia. The section there is considerably larger and more detailed than this page is, and I don't understand the rationale in splitting this out of the main page. There doesn't appear to have been an issue with the Australia section becoming too large for the main article, and thus suitably notable in its own right to warrant splitting. Perhaps the author can provide rationale as to why? KarmaKangaroo (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: No need for a separate article should be merged. Melbguy05 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]