Talk:Lobster dress

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lobster dress article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Lobster dress appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Elsa Schiaparelli prevented Salvador Dalí from adding mayonnaise to her lobster dress?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lobster dress.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Joofjoof (talk) 19:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Elsa Schiaparelli prevented Salvador Dalí from adding mayonnaise to her lobster dress? Source: "It is said that the exquisitely painted lobster narrowly missed being smeared with mayonnaise by Dali. Schiaparelli put her foot down." (https://books.google.com/books?id=rDLxAwAAQBAJ, Meryle Secrest, Elsa Schiaparelli: A Biography, Penguin)

Reviewed: Georgina Parkinson

Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 10:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Size and date check out; hooky fact cited, article well-cited to reliable sources. Earwig check shows CLP/copyvio not a concern; tweaked one sentence to avoid commonly-repeated phrasing. QPQ done. I believe this is good to go. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo?

This article cries out for a picture of its subject. While there is a description, "a picture is worth a thousand words." Surely, there's a pic out there. C'mon, Wikipedia! --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! Is there a reason not to use the Fashion Institute of Technology's photo and mark it as fair use using the catch-all fair use template? That seems like the most straightforward way to do this to me but would welcome thoughts from others. It would very clearly be fair use IMHO, as its very hard to meaningfully comment on the work without being able to show it. DocFreeman24 (talk) 00:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]