Jump to content

Talk:LiveOne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:LiveXLive)

Requests for editing

[edit]

This article should be merged with "AOL Radio" since AOL Radio was just an AOL-branded mirror of this site.

They are now known as LiveXLive. The Mo-Ja'al (talk) 01:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They are now known as livexone. Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was an uncontroversial merge. TipsyElephant (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I propose merging PodcastOne into LiveXLive. I think the content in PodcastOne can easily be explained in the context of LiveXLive, and I don't believe that PodcastOne meets the requirements of WP:CORPDEPTH because news coverage of the company consists entirely of WP:ROUTINE events, WP:SPS press releases, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples of trivial coverage includes "simple listings or compilations, such as: ... of employees, officers, directors, owners, or shareholders ... of product or service offerings" as well as "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage, such as: ... of the hiring, promotion, or departure of personnel, ... of the expansions, acquisitions, mergers, sale, or closure of the business, ... of a capital transaction, such as raised capital." TipsyElephant (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

One step short of blowing it up

[edit]

The article was a mash up of content about Slacker, LiveXLive, and PodcastOne. Slacker should have a standalone article; it predated LiveXLive by 10 years, and it's historically significant. Obviously the article can be expanded but for now it is at least factually accurate. JSFarman (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]