Jump to content

Talk:Little Red Lighthouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

shouldn't the title be Jeffrey Hook lighthouse (the official name)? Daveisland (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NAME: "Use names and terms most commonly used, and so most likely to be recognized, for the topic of the article." --agr (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Image

[edit]

I propose the use of this new image, covering both the lighthouse and the bridge, but I leave that to the criterion of the native editors. A very nice picture.--JotaCartas (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Little Red Lighthouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of the proposal

[edit]

I am not sure of the importance of the proposal and the level of detail present in the story of the proposal. I personally don't think it has a great relevance to the lighthouse, but if it is to remain it requires rewriting in the correct tone of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robrobrob2 (talkcontribs) 17:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

@Filetime: why did you revert my change to the infobox? I spent quite a long time making sure that all the data was preserved. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Red Lighthouse, Fort Washington Park.jpg is pretty inarguably a better image.Filetime (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, yes I agree! Was that the only issue? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Feel free to put the other content back. Filetime (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]