Jump to content

Talk:Literature of Botswana/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 06:01, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 22:05, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  • Difaqane and UoB are duplinked.
  • "impose English-language literature" Body says introduce British literature, neither impose and introduce nor English-langauge and British are equivalents.
  • "most common instances" to "most common forms"?
  • "Political separation of the Setswana-speaking populations in" to "The political separation of the Setswana-speaking populations into"?
  • I'd link quagga.
  • Tswana words like maboko, leina, bogwera, and kgosi should be in lang templates.
  • Link or gloss Motswana.
  • "but it fled" How does a press flee?
  • Pula (the journal) should be italicized.
  • Tswana newspaper names should also be in lang templates.
  • "South Africa one of his" needs a comma.
  • Will check sources later. AryKun (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made all of the suggested changes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Source review: Checked the following sources and found no issues.
  • Bahta, Samuel Ghile; Mutula, Stephen M. (2002). "Indigenous Publishing in Botswana: the current situation and the way forward". Information Development
  • Segal, Philip (1966). "Southern Africa: Rhodesia, Basutoland, Bechuanaland, Swaziland". The Journal of Commonwealth Literature
  • Batibo, Herman M. (2011). "Setswana: An under-exploited national resource?". In Bromber, Katrin; Smieja, Birgit (eds.). Globalisation and African Languages
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed