Jump to content

Talk:Lists of organisms by population

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Number of fish

[edit]

I think the estimate 3.5 trillion fish is too low, because the number of fish caught for food alone is between 1 and 3 trillion (http://fishcount.org.uk/fish-count-estimates/study-to-estimate-the-global-annual-numbers-of-fish-caught). In an article of mine (http://utilitarian-essays.com/one-trillion-fish.html), I estimate the oceanic population as ~13 trillion, and I think this is relatively conservative. -Brian Tomasik 05:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Tomasik (talkcontribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.35.9 (talk) 16:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lists of organisms by population. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]