Talk:Lists of New York City topics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is some impressive, and terrifying, metadata! Donbas 21:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPedia (sic) self references

Several places in the article, Categories are linked, instead of an article, and the link is marked with "(WikiPedia category)". Apart from the incorrect caps, should these be marked as such? They are a self-reference after all, which should be avoided. -- Chuq 01:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Be Bold -- 76.110.191.18 (talk) 08:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not whether or how Wikipedia's mentioned, and it's not (duh!) self-reference; however you prefer to handle it, there should be some way to tell whether an entry is for an incomplete category or else for a single comprehensive page or list (often the same or similar topics will have both a category and a list). Apart from glancing at a status bar (which not everyone keeps on his or her browser), a process which requires you to mouse over each entry individually, there's no prima facie way of distinguishing (as there would be on a category page when this article is just a list.) Be cautious. And (paradoxically) Happy Bastille Day! Shakescene (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]