Talk:Listen Money Matters

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is discussed in detail in several reliable sources (Quartz, Forbes, Business Insider, US News & World Report), thereby meeting the general notability guideline. --BlackHerbertoftheNorthpublic (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I got a notice that this was reviewed by a user named SisterTwister, who apparently approved it. Why is a second user seeking to delete it without even discussion? -- BlackHerbertoftheNorthpublic (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added a claim about the show's importance to the opening sentence for those who don't want to read further in the article. If this seems overly promotional, I would welcome suggestions about how to otherwise revise it. Thanks, BlackHerbertoftheNorthpublic (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister is one user. Multiple people (myself included) patrol new article creations and opinions may differ. Wikipedia tends to work by consensus. --Finngall ^talk 18:16, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]