Talk:List of wild pigeon species

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Birds Low‑importance

List of wild pigeon species is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Including ring dove?

I wonder, does this list have to include only one common name per species? Streptopelia risoria is used extensively in academic research and is very commonly refered to as the ring dove, rather that the Barbary dove. A search of Google Scholar for "ring dove" minus "barbary dove" gives 3,570 hits. I don't know whether Barbary dove is the more common term out there in the real world. Andamansea (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Phapitreron-amethystina.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 22, 2019 revision

The many changes made in this revision are listed here rather than in a long edit summary.

The former text is replaced with a paragraph which describes the source of the list and philosophy of the presentation. The full reference is included. All changes to the list proper are to match it to the reference, IOC version 9.1.

The original list was presented in what was apparently the IOC taxonomic sequence at the time it was created. The species have now been rearranged.

Twenty species are added to the former list. Because its source was neither named nor dated, I don't know which are recently described species, which are the result of splits, and which were omitted in error.

Twenty-five genera, three specific epithets, and eight common names have been revised.

One species has "(probably extinct)" revised to "(extinct)" and another has "(extinct)" added.

Ranges are updated.

A column is added to number by taxonomic sequence.

The column headers have been revised for clarity.

Misspellings throughout are corrected.

Craigthebirder (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]