Talk:List of state routes in Connecticut

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: Connecticut High‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Connecticut

Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Part2

This state's highway naming convention is up for debate above. Feel free to participate. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating pages for minor routes

I tried to create a page for Route 19, but am having trouble getting around the redirects to List of minor state routes in Connecticut. Any suggestions? Dan ad nauseam 21:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rt. 19 is a really minor route, which is why it is redirected to the minor routes list. But if you feel it deserves its own article, you can simply replace the redirect text with what you want to put in. You can go directly to the article here --Polaron | Talk 21:43, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"rv unnecessary bypassing of redirects"

Why is that unnecessary? If the name of the page is Connecticut Route 68, why should the list point to Route 68 (Connecticut), which just redirects to Connecticut Route 68? Drjayphd (talk) 19:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R2D and WP:USSH. The redirects are not broken. There is no need to change them. --Polaron | Talk 01:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, it just strikes me as odd that the policy is to revert it and point at the redirects, rather than "eh, either the direct link or the redirect's fine". Drjayphd (talk) 19:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Interstate and U.S. Highways in Connecticut

Why should this not be left as its own page? See List of Interstate Highways in New York, List of Interstate Highways in Pennsylvania, etc. There is also a List of State Routes in Pennsylvania and List of State Routes in New York. I'm pretty sure you shouldn't have deleted the other page. They are different lists. The one you deleted has different information. Deigo (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None of the other small states have separate lists. There is no fundamental reason why these should be separate as they are part of the same numbering system. If you want, you can reformat the entire list here into the style you used. --Polaron | Talk 23:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of State Routes in Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]