This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leaders by year, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Leaders by yearWikipedia:WikiProject Leaders by yearTemplate:WikiProject Leaders by yearLeaders by year articles
There seems to be a gap in Japan's list of prime ministers. Unless I've misread it, no-one's down for 03-06. (I believe Junichiro Koizumi's dates ought to extend to 06, not 03 as currently written).
Hi Tahc. I've noticed your merges of the yearly state leaders articles into their century equivalent, and I have to say, I don't think this is the best way of consolidating the data. List of state leaders in the 21st century, for example, is just exhaustive, tough to navigate and does away with the historical flags and original structure. I think these merges should be reversed, with the lists instead re-merged and sorted by decade (like List of state leaders in the 2000s, which would be consistent with List of sovereign states in the 2000s). This would be much easier to navigate and far less exhaustive. I've been thinking of doing this myself for some time but I'm interested to know your thoughts. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk·contribs·email) 20:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree List of state leaders in the 21st century is long, and I have already thought to break it up, but I was not sure if it would be better to do so in 25 year periods on 10 year periods, so I just put it off until later.
Dividing pages like these into decades is much easier than merging shorter time periods together. So that was another reason to delay until now.
The (main) drawback (at this point) to having pages of many shorter time periods is when someone like Carl XVI Gustaf dies, or otherwise stops being current leader, someone has to go back and change every such page he appears on, starting with the List of state leaders in the 1970s, or whatever. So more pages means it is harder to maintain.
Sure, we can have the discussion there. I don't see the problem in having to go back and change every such page; it shouldn't be an issue as most leaders don't last over decades, and those that do can be tracked easily with the search function, e.g. "1973–present" linksto:"Carl XVI Gustaf". As you'll see, there are about a dozen unrelated pages that include wording like this that would need updating any way. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk·contribs·email) 20:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We seems to be mostly agreeing but you have you have inexplicably changed List of state leaders in 2016 to the old version.
Let us wait on 1900s for a bit and see how well the by-decade things is working. It may be good to do 1950-1999 by decade but not necessarily 1900-1949. tahcchat20:59, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Tahc, though I don't think the changed layout is an improvement. The previous structure, with one section for each continent, was much easier to read. The links to lists of presidents and prime ministers are similarly unnecessary. The old layout should be restored, in my view. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk·contribs·email) 21:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was not any one previous structure. Many different systems were used inconsistently for different sections of history.
I think it should stay the same so that there is consistently across the 50 or 60 pages of history. This system made it absolutely easier to make the pages all (fairly) complete and without duplicate listings, and I consider it much easier to follow. Many times a country would change names with little or not change in location, but this will be all lost and confused if we make it alphabetical within continent. There are also a few nations without one name used by everyone. None the less, I am willing to listen to other ideas.
Of course, even if you are willing to change all 50 (or so) pages to an "alphabetical within continent" system, we should have a very clear consensus from people before doing so. tahcchat21:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]