Talk:List of sovereign states by economic freedom

Economic Freedom of the World Index

why is the USA listed twice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paranoid Android1208 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong data used

The country list for the Fraser ranking is wrong. The list uses the "human freedom index" ranking from Fraser, instead of the Economic Freedom of the World index from Fraser. Here u can see the two different reports: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/economic-freedom For example: in the economic freedom index of fraser the US is ranked 6th, but now it seems that it is ranked 18th. Could someone change this?

Other discussion

Why the huge discrepancy with Ireland?

My goodness, two reports by political groups being trumpeted as encyclopedic data without any scientific or independent sources at all. I recommend deleting this whole stinking pile. 2001:470:1F04:3DF:0:0:0:2 (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you on about? Both indices have their own very precise and specific measurements to rate economic freedom. Don't be an idiot. --70.74.198.46 (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why not full list?

The list shows top countries. Won't some be interested in others? Or bottom? I notice the same thing on related lists; is this policy?Septimus.stevens (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a pain in the a$$ to type in the data for 190+ countries, which is why we link the full list at the top. If you want to enter it, here's the list: https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/efw/efw2017/efw-2017-chapter-1.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.118.53.181 (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of countries by economic freedom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060904154024/http://www.freetheworld.com/release.html to http://www.freetheworld.com/release.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be marked for deletion?

The lists provided on this page have very little veracity if any at all. Methodology for determining economic freedom is very ambiguous, as is the term "economic freedom" itself. Both the Fraser Institute and the Heritage Foundation are right-libertarian think tanks that are notorious for polling and statistical bias purpose-made for serving libertarian and otherwise right-wing political aims. The Heritage Foundation, for example, is a noted climate change denial group according to their own Wikipedia article. Shouldn't the article have another perspective? Seems to me two lists, both from right-libertarian think tanks, violates WP:NPOV and is unencyclopedic. If another point of view cannot be added, the article should be marked for deletion. 141.126.95.5 (talk) 07:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it begs discussion of what exactly economic freedom is. There are nations here with positive scores that practice de facto slavery. Are these people economically free? 2601:1C2:700:2160:597:D6C7:5CF:8EE3 (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

when was comma China added to this Hong Kong (it wasn't like this for the last 10 years)? believer in human rights and democracy, and freedom, don't add in China

when was comma China added to this Hong Kong (it wasn't like this for the last 10 years)? people enjoy human rights and democracy, and freedom, Hong Kong is not part of China yet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.42.26 (talk) 08:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was added on around here curprev 05:53, 19 November 2019‎ 72.33.2.15 talk‎ 14,186 bytes -2‎ , who did this?

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_countries_by_economic_freedom&diff=926912877&oldid=926912825 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.42.26 (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]