Talk:List of scheduled monuments in Cheshire since 1539

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European BL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

BL

This article has been rated as BL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other two Wrenbury lift bridges

There are three listed Wrenbury liftbridges (the other two are Wrenbury Frith Bridge [1] & Wrenbury Church Bridge [2], which are both grade II*) -- are the other two not scheduled also? Espresso Addict (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think they must be, but the evidence was not clear. Images of England does not say either way. Pastscape includes the one I have included here but not the other ones. The Schedule of Buildings of Architectural or Historic Interest in Crewe and Nantwich here includes all three bridges, plus the 19th-century road bridge, plus many more; they cannot all be scheduled. Which leaves us with Revealing Cheshire's Past. This also includes the one I have included here, but not the others. However it does state "Two others are also scheduled on this canal". As all date from the same time, were designed by the same architect, and are of the same type, I am happy to accept that all three are scheduled and I will include them. Thanks for spotting this. Why can sources not supply the information better?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think they must be the two other bridges that Revealing Cheshire's Past mentions in passing, but I don't understand why they don't rate a mention on the other sites, especially as the two footbridges are far closer to the original Telford design as they haven't been altered to take road traffic. One wonders what other SMs are missing.... Espresso Addict (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite!--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The National Heritage List for England includes only the one bridge as a SAM so I've deleted the other two. --82.69.55.220 (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of scheduled monuments in Cheshire since 1539. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of scheduled monuments in Cheshire since 1539. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306190311/http://www.cheshire.gov.uk/Archaeology/RCP/RevealingCheshiresPast.htm to http://www.cheshire.gov.uk/Archaeology/RCP/RevealingCheshiresPast.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]